Monday, April 7, 2025
HomeCloudAhoi Attacks - New Attack Breaking VMs With Malicious Interrupts

Ahoi Attacks – New Attack Breaking VMs With Malicious Interrupts

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

Ahoy, which is often associated with communicating to ships, has now been playfully adopted in pirate language.

We coin ‘Ahoi,’ an anagram of ‘Iago,’ to pay tribute to research on interface attacks with TEEs.

Confidential computing, also referred to as trusted execution, protects sensitive computations on public cloud platforms. 

- Advertisement - Google News

Hardware vendors provide trusted hardware that guarantees user code and data security from malicious actors.

Ahoi Attacks

Cloud providers now offer confidential computing via technologies like Intel SGX for process-level isolation and AMD SEV, Intel TDX, and ARM CCA for VM-level isolation as Confidential VMs (CVMs). 

SGX enclaves isolate single processes from other processes/OS, while CVMs allow deploying entire isolated VMs inaccessible to other tenants, provider’s hardware/software like hypervisors.

Document
Stop Advanced Phishing Attack With AI

AI-Powered Protection for Business Email Security

Trustifi’s Advanced threat protection prevents the widest spectrum of sophisticated attacks before they reach a user’s mailbox. Stopping 99% of phishing attacks missed by other email security solutions. .

CVMs enable better cloud-native confidential computing abstraction than SGX’s process-level model.

Interrupt management is done almost entirely by the hypervisor in CVMs. CVM security can be breached by Ahoi attacks using notifications.

The hypervisor virtualizes the delivery of interrupts necessary for the operation of CVMs.

This hooks physical interrupts, redirects them to corresponding virtual machines, and raises virtual interrupts.

As a result, the guest OS within this CVM handles these interrupts via their handlers and ultimately acknowledges them.

The hardware exception is mapped in “x86” to the interrupts 0 through 31.

An example of this is when a divide-by-zero occurs and raises interrupt 0, which the OS converts to SIGFPE for user-space delivery.

Applying for a custom handler is like calculating the non-weighted average of SIGFPE.

Ahoi attacks have virtual CPUs that are attacked using a hypervisor to inject malicious interrupts into them, which helps invoke interrupt handlers globally.

Execution flow leading to successful authentication (Source – Github)

Ahoi attacks can take advantage of the interrupts and signals, which were made for trusted hypervisor environments.

Projects like Heckler can demonstrate this, as they have demonstrated how to breach AMD SEV-SNP and Intel TDX to gain unauthorized access to CVMs. 

Moreover, such vulnerabilities extend even up to specialized interrupt interfaces such as AMD SEV’s VMM Communication Exception (#VC) meant for safe hypervisor-CVM communication. 

However, this interface can be used by hypervisors to perform malicious tasks that are executed without being caught by CVMs.

WeSee exploits AMD SEV-SNP’s flaws to do forbidden things on CVMs.

Secure your emails in a heartbeat! To find your ideal email security vendor, Take a Free 30-Second Assessment.

Tushar Subhra
Tushar Subhra
Tushar is a Cyber security content editor with a passion for creating captivating and informative content. With years of experience under his belt in Cyber Security, he is covering Cyber Security News, technology and other news.

Latest articles

Threat Actors Exploit Fake CAPTCHAs and Cloudflare Turnstile to Distribute LegionLoader

In a sophisticated attack targeting individuals searching for PDF documents online, cybercriminals are using...

HellCat, Rey, and Grep Groups Dispute Claims in Orange and HighWire Press Cases

SuspectFile.com has uncovered a complex web of overlapping claims and accusations within the cybercrime...

AI Surpasses Elite Red Teams in Crafting Effective Spear Phishing Attacks

In a groundbreaking development in the field of cybersecurity, AI has reached a pivotal...

Threat Actors Use Windows Screensaver Files as Malware Delivery Method

Cybersecurity experts at Symantec have uncovered a sophisticated phishing campaign targeting various sectors across...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

HellCat, Rey, and Grep Groups Dispute Claims in Orange and HighWire Press Cases

SuspectFile.com has uncovered a complex web of overlapping claims and accusations within the cybercrime...

MediaTek Releases Security Patch to Fix Vulnerabilities in Mobile and IoT Devices

MediaTek, a prominent semiconductor company specializing in mobile, IoT, and multimedia chipsets, has announced...

50,000+ WordPress Sites Vulnerable to Privilege Escalation Attacks

In a recent cybersecurity development, over 50,000 WordPress websites using the Uncanny Automator plugin...