Monday, April 7, 2025
HomeCVE/vulnerabilityCritical Security Vulnerabilities Exposes Apache’s popular Remote Desktop Gateway for Hacking

Critical Security Vulnerabilities Exposes Apache’s popular Remote Desktop Gateway for Hacking

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

Two critical security vulnerabilities found with Apache’s popular open-source remote desktop gateway Apache Guacamole. It supports all standard protocols like VNC, RDP, and SSH.

The tool also comes with support for MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication), compliance with BYOD, and other security controls like IPS, SOC anomaly detections, and many more.

Now in this pandemic situation, most of the workforce moved to remote work, vulnerabilities like these pose serious risks.

- Advertisement - Google News

Check Point Research discovered two critical vulnerabilities with Apache Guacamole CVE-2020-9498 & CVE-2020-9497.

Apache Guacamole

To use Apache Guacamole no plugins or client software are required, so it is called as clientless, it has over 10 million docker downloads worldwide.

“Check Point’s researchers found that some of Guacamole’s ingredients didn’t meet the required security standards. In particular, it was vulnerable to several critical Reverse RDP Vulnerabilities, and affected by multiple new vulnerabilities found in FreeRDP.”

The vulnerabilities allow attackers to compromise a computer inside an organization and connect back via unsuspecting as a worker connecting to the machine.

This allows attackers to go gain full control over the Guacamole server and to gain control over all the sessions. The vulnerabilities affect both FreeRDP and Apache Guacamole. Here is the video demo;

CVE-2020-9497 – Improper Input Validation

The vulnerability is due to improper input validation of RDP static virtual channels, it affects Apache Guacamole 1.1.0 and older versions.

If a user connects via a malicious or compromised RDP server, then a specially-crafted data could result in information disclosure within the memory of the guacd process handling the connection.

CVE-2020-9498 – Memory Corruption

The flaw is because of Apache Guacamole 1.1.0 and older versions mishandle pointers received via RDP static virtual channels.

“If a user connects to a malicious or compromised RDP server, a series of specially-crafted PDUs could result in memory corruption, possibly allowing arbitrary code to be executed with the privileges of the
running guacd process.”

The vulnerabilities are fixed with Apache Guacamole 1.2.0, users are recommended to update with the latest version.

Check Point disclosed the vulnerabilities to Apache & FreeRDP. Apache has patched the vulnerabilities and issued 2 CVE-IDs.

You can follow us on LinkedinTwitterFacebook for daily Cybersecurity and hacking news updates.

Also Read

13-year-old Ghostcat Bug Affected Apache-Tomcat Let Hackers Remotely Inject Any Files in The Servers

Apache Tomcat Security Update for Remote Code Execution Vulnerability on Windows

Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

Threat Actors Exploit Toll Payment Services in Widespread Hacking Campaign

In a sophisticated cybercrime operation, the Smishing Triad, a China-based group, has been identified...

Everest Ransomware Gang’s Leak Site Hacked and Defaced

TechCrunch has uncovered a concerning development in consumer-grade spyware: a stealthy Android monitoring app...

ToddyCat Attackers Exploited ESET Command Line Scanner Vulnerability to Conceal Their Tool

In a sophisticated cyberattack, the notorious ToddyCat APT group utilized a previously unknown vulnerability...

Threat Actors Use VPS Hosting Providers to Deliver Malware and Evade Detection

Cybercriminals are intensifying phishing campaigns to spread the Grandoreiro banking trojan, targeting users primarily...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Threat Actors Exploit Toll Payment Services in Widespread Hacking Campaign

In a sophisticated cybercrime operation, the Smishing Triad, a China-based group, has been identified...

Everest Ransomware Gang’s Leak Site Hacked and Defaced

TechCrunch has uncovered a concerning development in consumer-grade spyware: a stealthy Android monitoring app...

ToddyCat Attackers Exploited ESET Command Line Scanner Vulnerability to Conceal Their Tool

In a sophisticated cyberattack, the notorious ToddyCat APT group utilized a previously unknown vulnerability...