Friday, February 28, 2025
HomeMalwareBlackgear Cyberespionage Abuses Blogging and Social Media Services To Evade Detection

Blackgear Cyberespionage Abuses Blogging and Social Media Services To Evade Detection

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

Blackgear Cyberespionage campaign is active at least from 2008, the threat actors behind the campaign use various malware tools such as the Protux and Elirks backdoor.

Trend Micro Security researchers spotted the operators behind Blackgear started using their own tools based on the new attacks. As a notable behavior to avoid detection it abuses Social Media, microblogging and blogging services to hide its command-and-control (C&C) details.

Blackgear Cyberespionage Attack chain

The recent attack campaign starts by sending a spam mail that contains decoy document or fake installer that tempt users clicking into it. The malicious document then extracts the Marade downloader and stores in the Temp folder.

Marade check’s that host can connect to the internet and also for the presence of AV software, if the system doesn’t have AV installed it connects to a Blackgear-controlled public blog or social media to retrieve the encrypted C&C configuration if the system has AV enables it uses the configuration embedded with it.

Blackgear Cyberespionage

The encrypted strings pose like a magnetic string to avoid AV detection, later Marade will decrypt it to retrieve information from the C&C server. The C&C server delivers a known backdoor Protux and retrieves C&C information form blog posts and uses open source compiler with RSA algorithm to generate a session key and send back to C&C server.

According to researchers, “Blackgear’s malware tools are delivered to targets using RAR self-extracting executable (SFX) files or office Visual Basic Script (VBScript) to create a decoy document. The encrypted configurations of recent versions of Marade and Protux appear to be similar.”

The new version of Protux comes with a Protux’s remote controller tool that graphical interface and allows attackers to monitor compromised machines.

Blackgear Cyberespionage

“Based on the controller’s behavior, we can posit that both Marade and Protux were authored by the same threat actors.”

The Marade is the first stage of attack the check’s the compromised system is of interest to them. Then it delivers the second stage backdoor Protux to establish communication with the compromised system.

Blackgrear targeting number of industry sectors that include telecommunications, defense, government, aerospace, and high-tech sectors. It primarily targeting organizations in Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan.

Also Read

DanaBot Banking Trojan Steal Private and Sensitive Information

Russian APT28 Hacking Group Tracked Using a Variant X-Agent Delivering Via JPG File

Advanced Mobile Malware Attack Against iPhones in India using MDM System Control

Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

New Pass-the-Cookie Attacks Bypass MFA, Giving Hackers Full Account Access

Multi-factor authentication (MFA), long considered a cornerstone of cybersecurity defense, is facing a formidable...

Chinese Hackers Exploit Check Point VPN Zero-Day to Target Organizations Globally

A sophisticated cyberespionage campaign linked to Chinese state-sponsored actors has exploited a previously patched...

PingAM Java Agent Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Bypass Security

A critical security flaw (CVE-2025-20059) has been identified in supported versions of Ping Identity’s...

New GitHub Scam Uses Fake “Mods” and “Cracks” to Steal User Data

A sophisticated malware campaign leveraging GitHub repositories disguised as game modifications and cracked software...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Winos4.0 Malware Targets Windows Users Through Malicious PDF Files

A new wave of cyberattacks leveraging the Winos4.0 malware framework has targeted organizations in...

Lotus Blossom Hacker Group Uses Dropbox, Twitter, and Zimbra for C2 Communications

The Lotus Blossom hacker group, also known as Spring Dragon, Billbug, or Thrip, has...

Squidoor: Multi-Vector Malware Exploiting Outlook API, DNS & ICMP Tunneling for C2

A newly identified malware, dubbed "Squidoor," has emerged as a sophisticated threat targeting government,...