Tuesday, April 1, 2025
HomeCyber AttackChromeLoader - New Malware Using a browser Extension to Attack Organizations

ChromeLoader – New Malware Using a browser Extension to Attack Organizations

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

New variants of ChromeLoader, a malware that steals information from websites, have been discovered by security researchers at Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, demonstrating how quickly the malware is evolving its features over time.

Malware such as ChromeLoader hijacks victims’ browser searches to display advertisements and hacks their browser search engine results. 

In January 2022, ChromeLoader was discovered and is being distributed as ISO or DMG files that can be downloaded from sites like Twitter and free gaming websites by using QR codes attached to the URL.

A number of cybersecurity groups have also given ChromeLoader the following names:-

  • Choziosi Loader
  • ChromeBack

Different Variants

Here below we have mentioned all the different variants of this malware:-

  • Variant 0: The Real First Windows Variant
  • Variant 1: Infection Vector
  • Variant 2: Second Windows Variant
  • MacOS Variant

Technical Analysis

In the case of the adware in question, what is noteworthy is that it has been crafted as an extension for the browser rather than an executable (.exe) or Dynamic Link Library (.dll) for Windows.

As a general rule, these infections are spread through malicious advertising campaigns on pay-per-install sites and social media that are meant to lure users into downloading fake movie torrents or fake cracked video games and software.

In addition, it has also been designed so that it can intercept all searches performed by users using search engines like:-

  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Bing 

This allows the threat actors to gather sensitive information about the users’ online activities by accessing their web browser data and manipulating web requests.

Initially, ChromeLoader malware was seen targeted at Windows users in January, and a macOS variant was seen targeted at macOS users in March.

There are several attacks that have been attributed to the malware, although the first reported attack occurred in December 2021. In that case, the executable was created using an AutoHotKey compiler, as opposed to the ISO files that are now commonly seen.

In addition, it is also claimed that the first version of this malware lacks obfuscation abilities. In later iterations of the malware, this feature has been incorporated in order to disguise the purpose and the malicious code behind the malware.

It is clear from this attack chain that two emerging trends are gaining popularity among malware authors – the use of ISO (and DMG) files, as well as the use of browser extensions – that security products and even average users, should be aware of.

You can follow us on LinkedinTwitterFacebook for daily Cybersecurity and hacking news updates.

Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Latest articles

Kentico Xperience CMS XSS Vulnerability Allows Remote Code Execution

Kentico Xperience CMS, a widely used platform designed for enterprises and organizations, is under...

LensDeal Data Breach Exposes 100,000 Customers’ Personal Information

A major data breach involving LensDeal, a Netherlands-based contact lens supplier, has reportedly exposed...

Apple Issues Warning on Three 0-Day Vulnerabilities Under Active Exploitation

Apple has issued an urgent security advisory concerning three critical zero-day vulnerabilities – CVE-2025-24200, CVE-2025-24201, and CVE-2025-24085 –...

Microsoft Discovers GRUB2, U-Boot, and Barebox Bootloader Flaws with Copilot

Microsoft has disclosed the discovery of multiple critical vulnerabilities within the GRUB2, U-Boot, and...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Microsoft Discovers GRUB2, U-Boot, and Barebox Bootloader Flaws with Copilot

Microsoft has disclosed the discovery of multiple critical vulnerabilities within the GRUB2, U-Boot, and...

Operation HollowQuill – Weaponized PDFs Deliver a Cobalt Strike Malware Into Gov & Military Networks

In a recent revelation by SEQRITE Labs, a highly sophisticated cyber-espionage campaign, dubbed Operation...

Earth Alux Hackers Use VARGIET Malware to Target Organizations

A new wave of cyberattacks orchestrated by the advanced persistent threat (APT) group Earth...