Saturday, March 8, 2025
HomeCryptocurrency hackGoogle Declares First-Ever SHA-1 attack

Google Declares First-Ever SHA-1 attack

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

The use of SHA-1 certificates has been depreciated due to the ever-present necessity to strengthen procedures and strategies against a background of continually enhancing computational power.

A Collision Attack is an attempt to discover two information strings of a hash capacity that deliver a similar hash result.

Since hash capacities have boundless info length and a predefined output length, there is unavoidably going to be the likelihood of two unique information sources that deliver a similar yield hash.

After a long-term research between the Cryptology Group and the Google Research Security, they proposed the research paper detailing the SHA-1 collision attack.

Identical hashes 

It is practically conceivable to pursuit two impacting PDF documents and acquires an   SHA-1 digital signature on the first PDF record which can likewise be abuse as a valid digital signature on the second PDF document.

They also provided two PDF files with SHA-1 hash File1, File2 and infographic file tester to check the collision attack.

Google Declares First-Ever SHA-1 attack

It depends on the idea of counter-cryptanalysis and it can identify known and obscure SHA-1 cryptanalytic impact attack given only a solitary document from a colliding record document pair.

Who is capable of launching the attack

This attack required more than 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 SHA1 consideration. This took the proportionate handling power as 6,500 years of single-CPU calculations and 110 years of single-GPU calculations.

Google Declares First-Ever SHA-1 attack

The Shattered attack is 100,000 speedier than the brute force attack that depends on the birthday Catch 22. The brute force attack would need 12,000,000 GPU years to finish, and it is in this way unrealistic.

Did My SSL Certificate under Risk

Any Certification Authority submitting to the CA/Browser Forum directions is not permitted to issue SHA-1 testaments any longer.

Moreover, it is required that certificate authorities embed no less than 20 bits of randomness inside the serial number field. In the event that appropriately executed these aides keeping a possible exploitation.

Also Read:

Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

10 Best Penetration Testing Companies in 2025

Penetration testing companies play a vital role in strengthening the cybersecurity defenses of organizations...

Lumma Stealer Using Fake Google Meet & Windows Update Sites to Launch “Click Fix” Style Attack

Cybersecurity researchers continue to track sophisticated "Click Fix" style distribution campaigns that deliver the...

Fake BianLian Ransom Demands Sent via Physical Letters to U.S. Firms

In a novel and concerning development, multiple U.S. organizations have reported receiving suspicious physical...

Strela Stealer Malware Attack Microsoft Outlook Users for Credential Theft

The cybersecurity landscape has recently been impacted by the emergence of the Strela Stealer...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Authorities Seize $31 Million Linked to Crypto Exchange Hack

U.S. authorities announced the seizure of $31 million tied to the 2021 Uranium Finance...

Stablecoin Bank Hit by Cyberattack, Loses $49.5M to Hackers

The cryptocurrency sector faced one of its most significant security breaches this year as...

Biggest Crypto Hack in History – Hackers Stolen $1.46 Billion Worth Crypto From Bybit

In what has become the largest cryptocurrency theft in history, hackers infiltrated Bybit’s Ethereum...