Tuesday, March 4, 2025
Homecyber securityHackers Use Weaponized Documents to Attack U.S. Aerospace Industry

Hackers Use Weaponized Documents to Attack U.S. Aerospace Industry

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

An American aerospace company has been the target of a commercial cyberespionage campaign dubbed AeroBlade, which appears to be aimed at carrying out both competitive and commercial cyberespionage.

The threat actor employed spear-phishing as the means of distribution mechanism.

A weaponized document that was delivered as an email attachment reportedly has a malicious VBA macro code embedded in it as well as a remote template injection mechanism to provide the next stage of the payload execution, according to the BlackBerry Threat Research and Intelligence team.

AeroBlade Execution Chain

The network infrastructure and weaponization of the attacker appear to have gone active around September 2022, based on the evidence. 

Researchers estimate that the attack’s offensive phase took place in July 2023 with medium to high confidence. The network infrastructure stayed the same during that period, but the attacker’s toolset increased, making it stealthier.

There were two campaigns found, and there were a few similarities between them, such as:

  • Both lure documents were named “[redacted].docx.”
  • The final payload is a reverse shell.
  • The command-and-control (C2) server IP address is the same.

There were a few differences between the two campaigns, such as:

  • The final payload of the attack is stealthier and uses more obfuscation and anti-analysis techniques.
  • The campaign’s final payload includes an option to list directories from infected victims.
https://blogs.blackberry.com/content/dam/blogs-blackberry-com/images/blogs/2023/11/aeroblade-fig01.png
AeroBlade execution chain

A targeted email containing a malicious document attachment with the filename [redacted].docx is the first sign of an infection.

When the document is opened, it shows text in a purposefully jumbled font and a “lure” message requesting that the potential victim click on it to activate the content in Microsoft Office.

https://blogs.blackberry.com/content/dam/blogs-blackberry-com/images/blogs/2023/11/aeroblade-fig02.png
Malicious document displays text in a scrambled font

The next-stage information is saved in an XML (eXtensible Markup Language) file inside a .dotm file. A.dotm file is a Microsoft Word document template that contains the default layout, settings, and macros for a document.

When the victim manually clicks the “Enable Content” lure message and opens the file, the [redacted].dotm document drops a new file to the system and opens it.

“The newly downloaded document is readable, leading the victim to believe that the file initially received by email is legitimate. In fact, it’s a classic cyber bait-and-switch, performed invisibly right under the victim’s nose”, researchers said.

An executable file that is run on the system via the macro will be the final stage of execution. The final payload is a DLL that connects to a hard-coded C2 server and functions as a reverse shell.  With the use of reverse shells, attackers can force communication and gain total control of the target machine by open ports.

https://blogs.blackberry.com/content/dam/blogs-blackberry-com/images/blogs/2023/11/aeroblade-fig14.png
Example of information collected from infected system

An American aerospace organization was the targeted target of both campaigns, based on the content of the lure message. Its goal was probably to obtain insight into its target’s internal resources to assess its vulnerability to a potential ransom demand.

Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

Pathfinder AI – Hunters Announces New AI Capabilities for Smarter SOC Automation

Pathfinder AI expands Hunters' vision for AI-driven SOCs, introducing Agentic AI for autonomous investigation...

Google Secretly Tracks Android Devices Even Without User-Opened Apps

A recent technical study conducted by researchers at Trinity College Dublin has revealed that...

LLMjacking – Hackers Abuse GenAI With AWS NHIs to Hijack Cloud LLMs

In a concerning development, cybercriminals are increasingly targeting cloud-based generative AI (GenAI) services in...

Microsoft Strengthens Trust Boundary for VBS Enclaves

Microsoft has introduced a series of technical recommendations to bolster the security of Virtualization-Based...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Pathfinder AI – Hunters Announces New AI Capabilities for Smarter SOC Automation

Pathfinder AI expands Hunters' vision for AI-driven SOCs, introducing Agentic AI for autonomous investigation...

Google Secretly Tracks Android Devices Even Without User-Opened Apps

A recent technical study conducted by researchers at Trinity College Dublin has revealed that...

LLMjacking – Hackers Abuse GenAI With AWS NHIs to Hijack Cloud LLMs

In a concerning development, cybercriminals are increasingly targeting cloud-based generative AI (GenAI) services in...