Tuesday, May 20, 2025
HomeCyber AttackMicrosoft Changed the Method of Naming the Hacker Groups

Microsoft Changed the Method of Naming the Hacker Groups

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

Microsoft has initiated the naming taxonomy for threat actor groups. Over the years, threat actors have evolved massively, leading to confusion about which threat actor was responsible for which threat activity.

To solve this, Microsoft has introduced this naming taxonomy and categorized them based on their origin and activity.

Though threat intelligence has emerged massively, it must still be an organized data resource that can help protect and prioritize based on the hacking groups confronted.

- Advertisement - Google News
Weather-based Hacking group name taxonomy

Microsoft has relied on weather condition names for naming these hacking groups as this can be easy to remember and spread the word.

Categorization

Microsoft has categorized threat actors into five main groups based on their operations.

  1. Nation-state – These threat actors work on behalf of or are directly supported by a nation/state. They specifically target government agencies, intergovernmental organizations, espionage, financial gain, or as an act of retribution.
  2. Financially Motivated – These threat actors target an organization or an individual as a part of a financial motive. These threat actors/ groups did not seem to be linked with nation-state actors. The best examples of these threat actors are ransomware operators, phishing groups, or other groups with purely money-minded activities.
  3. Private Sector Offensive actors (PSOAs): These are threat actors who were once known as legal organizations but later seemed to have been involved in activities like creating malware, selling weapons and surveillance software to cyber criminals who use them for illegal purposes, or targeting any white-collar individuals. The best example of this kind of threat actor was the QuaDream company which was shut down recently for its malicious activities.
  4. Influence Operations: These are the threat actors that spread misinformation among people to disrupt or manipulate people’s interests. This kind of threat actor is also involved in political manipulations for malicious purposes.
  5. Groups in Development: This category set by Microsoft includes threat actors whose origin and way of operations are yet to be confirmed. In other words, these include threat actors still in developmental phases and involved in small-scale malicious attacks.

Microsoft has also released complete information on their new weather name taxonomy, including the family name, their origin or country of operation, and their category.

Building Your Malware Defense Strategy – Download Free E-Book

Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

New Phishing Attack Poses as Zoom Meeting Invites to Steal Login Credentials

A newly identified phishing campaign is targeting unsuspecting users by masquerading as urgent Zoom...

New Hannibal Stealer Uses Stealth and Obfuscation to Evade Detection

A newly identified piece of malware, dubbed the "Hannibal Stealer," has emerged as a...

Chinese APT Hackers Target Organizations Using Korplug Loaders and Malicious USB Drives

Advanced persistent threat (APT) groups with ties to China have become persistent players in...

Cache Timing Techniques Used to Bypass Windows 11 KASLR and Reveal Kernel Base

Cache timing side-channel attacks have been used to circumvent Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization...

Resilience at Scale

Why Application Security is Non-Negotiable

The resilience of your digital infrastructure directly impacts your ability to scale. And yet, application security remains a critical weak link for most organizations.

Application Security is no longer just a defensive play—it’s the cornerstone of cyber resilience and sustainable growth. In this webinar, Karthik Krishnamoorthy (CTO of Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface), will share how AI-powered application security can help organizations build resilience by

Discussion points


Protecting at internet scale using AI and behavioral-based DDoS & bot mitigation.
Autonomously discovering external assets and remediating vulnerabilities within 72 hours, enabling secure, confident scaling.
Ensuring 100% application availability through platforms architected for failure resilience.
Eliminating silos with real-time correlation between attack surface and active threats for rapid, accurate mitigation

More like this

New Phishing Attack Poses as Zoom Meeting Invites to Steal Login Credentials

A newly identified phishing campaign is targeting unsuspecting users by masquerading as urgent Zoom...

New Hannibal Stealer Uses Stealth and Obfuscation to Evade Detection

A newly identified piece of malware, dubbed the "Hannibal Stealer," has emerged as a...

Chinese APT Hackers Target Organizations Using Korplug Loaders and Malicious USB Drives

Advanced persistent threat (APT) groups with ties to China have become persistent players in...