Sunday, July 14, 2024
EHA

Backdoor in upstream xz/liblzma Let Attackers Hack SSH Servers

A startling revelation has identified a dangerous security vulnerability in the xz compression utility, specifically within its liblzma library. This vulnerability has been found to compromise SSH server security.

Xz Utils is a tool found almost everywhere in Linux. It helps to shrink data without losing any information on almost all systems similar to Linux.

It’s important for making data smaller or returning it to its original size during various tasks. Xz Utils can also work with the old .lzma format, which makes it even more useful.

The issue, traced back to a backdoor in the upstream xz repository, was first noticed due to unusual system behavior on Debian sid installations, including excessive CPU usage during SSH logins and errors reported by the memory error detector, Valgrind.

Discovery of the Backdoor

The investigation, led by security expert Andres Freund, uncovered that the backdoor was not limited to Debian’s package but was, in fact, present in the upstream xz tarballs for versions 5.6.0 and 5.6.1.

This malicious code was ingeniously hidden within the distributed tarballs and not in the source code available on the repository, making it particularly insidious.

The backdoor operates by injecting an obfuscated script into the build process, which then modifies the Makefile to execute a payload hidden within seemingly innocuous test files.

Once executed, this payload can modify the behavior of the SSH server, significantly slowing down SSH logins and potentially allowing unauthorized access.

Document
Run Free ThreatScan on Your Mailbox

AI-Powered Protection for Business Email Security

Trustifi’s Advanced threat protection prevents the widest spectrum of sophisticated attacks before they reach a user’s mailbox. Try Trustifi Free Threat Scan with Sophisticated AI-Powered Email Protection .

Scope and Impact

The vulnerability explicitly targets x86-64 Linux systems built with GCC and the GNU linker and appears to be designed to evade detection by only activating under certain conditions, such as during the build process of Debian or RPM packages.

This targeted approach suggests a sophisticated understanding of Linux distribution build systems and a clear intent to infiltrate these systems undetected.

Notably, the backdoor does not directly affect the OpenSSH package but exploits a dependency chain where subsystem, patched into openSSH by several Linux distributions, relies on the compromised liblzma.

This indirect attack vector highlights the complex interdependencies in modern software ecosystems and the potential for widespread impact from a single vulnerability.

According to the Red Hat report, this backdoor is only in the latest branch of xz (version 5.6 and 5.6.1). People still running versions 5.4 and older should be fine.

“Current investigation indicates that the packages are only present in Fedora 40 and Fedora Rawhide within the Red Hat community ecosystem, No versions of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) are affected”.

Response and Mitigation

The discovery of this vulnerability has prompted immediate action from the security community.

Red Hat has assigned the issue CVE-2024-3094, and efforts are underway to patch affected systems and prevent further exploitation. A detection script has also been developed to help system administrators identify potentially vulnerable installations.

Given the severity of the vulnerability and the potential for unauthorized access to affected systems, users and administrators of potentially impacted systems are urged to upgrade their installations as soon as possible.

The discovery of this backdoor serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing threats to software security and the need for vigilance in monitoring and securing critical infrastructure.

The discovery of a backdoor in the widely used xz compression utility underscores software security’s persistent challenges.

As attackers develop sophisticated infiltration methods, the security community must remain vigilant in identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities.

Stay updated on Cybersecurity news, Whitepapers, and Infographics. Follow us on LinkedIn & Twitter.

Website

Latest articles

mSpy Data Breach: Millions of Customers’ Data Exposed

mSpy, a widely used phone spyware application, has suffered a significant data breach, exposing...

Advance Auto Parts Cyber Attack: Over 2 Million Users Data Exposed

RALEIGH, NC—Advance Stores Company, Incorporated, a prominent commercial entity in the automotive industry, has...

Hackers Using ClickFix Social Engineering Tactics to Deploy Malware

Cybersecurity researchers at McAfee Labs have uncovered a sophisticated new method of malware delivery,...

Coyote Banking Trojan Attacking Windows Users To Steal Login Details

Hackers use Banking Trojans to steal sensitive financial information. These Trojans can also intercept...

Hackers Created 700+ Fake Domains to Sell Olympic Games Tickets

As the world eagerly anticipates the Olympic Games Paris 2024, a cybersecurity threat has...

Japanese Space Agency Spotted zero-day via Microsoft 365 Services

The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) has revealed details of a cybersecurity incident that...

Top 10 Active Directory Management Tools – 2024

Active Directory Management Tools are essential for IT administrators to manage and secure Active...
Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Free Webinar

Low Rate DDoS Attack

9 of 10 sites on the AppTrana network have faced a DDoS attack in the last 30 days.
Some DDoS attacks could readily be blocked by rate-limiting, IP reputation checks and other basic mitigation methods.
More than 50% of the DDoS attacks are employing botnets to send slow DDoS attacks where millions of IPs are being employed to send one or two requests per minute..
Key takeaways include:

  • The mechanics of a low-DDoS attack
  • Fundamentals of behavioural AI and rate-limiting
  • Surgical mitigation actions to minimize false positives
  • Role of managed services in DDoS monitoring

Related Articles