Thursday, March 6, 2025
HomeCyber Security NewsEarth Lusca Using Multiplatform Backdoor to Attack Windows & Linux Machines

Earth Lusca Using Multiplatform Backdoor to Attack Windows & Linux Machines

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

Earth Lusca is a suspected China-based cyber espionage group active since at least April 2019.

Besides this, hackers often target Windows and Linux machines primarily due to their widespread use and potential for financial gain.

Trend Micro security experts recently uncovered a sophisticated new Golang-based backdoor named “KTLVdoor,” deployed by the Chinese threat actor Earth Lusca. 

This highly obfuscated, multiplatform malware family infects Windows and Linux systems, often disguising itself as standard system utilities to evade detection. 

Earth Lusca Using Multiplatform Backdoor

KTLVdoor provides threat actors with extensive remote control capabilities, such as executing commands, file manipulation, information gathering, proxy usage, and port scanning. 

The operation is large in scale, with over 50 command-and-control servers hosted on Alibaba’s infrastructure in China, communicating with several malware variants. 

Though it’s primarily tied to Earth Lusca, the shared infrastructure also suggests the potential involvement of other Chinese threat groups.

This campaign’s samples are heavily obfuscated, reinserting random base64-like encoded strings and function names in embedded strings.

Obfuscated function names (Source - Trend Micro)

The agent’s settings are hidden and contain XOR-encoded agent configuration parameters. Base64 features a proprietary form resembling a TLV-like format.

Are You From SOC/DFIR Teams? - Try Advanced Malware and Phishing Analysis With ANY.RUN - 14 day free trial

Trend Micro said that the configuration is implemented by restoring the internal structure corresponding to the machine and keeping the addresses of C&C servers encrypted in AES-GCM-encrypted values.

After the start-up, the agent communicates with the C&C server through GZIP-compressed and AES-GCM-encrypted messages.

Besides this, the PortScan implements the following scanning methods:-

  • ScanTCP
  • ScanRDP
  • ScanWinRM
  • ScanSmb2
  • RdpWithNTLM
  • DialTLS
  • DialTCP
  • ScanPing
  • ScanPing
  • ScanMssql
  • ScanBanner
  • ScanWeb

Communication can be unidirectional or bidirectional, consisting of a header and message data.

The agent has been assigned task-processing handlers for the threat actor Earth Lusca; however, the campaign details are unknown.

The atypical infrastructure with all C&C servers on Alibaba’s IP addresses suggests that this is the current environment of Earth Lusca or some other Chinese-speaking threat actors arming themselves and playing around with the new tools that have yet to be released.

Cybersecurity researchers urged that it remains important to ensure the ongoing monitoring of this activity.

What Does MITRE ATT&CK Expose About Your Enterprise Security? - Watch Free Webinar!

Tushar Subhra
Tushar Subhra
Tushar is a Cyber security content editor with a passion for creating captivating and informative content. With years of experience under his belt in Cyber Security, he is covering Cyber Security News, technology and other news.

Latest articles

Sitecore Zero-Day Flaw Allows Remote Code Execution

A critical zero-day vulnerability in Sitecore’s enterprise content management system (CMS) has been uncovered,...

Apache Airflow Misconfigurations Leak Login Credentials to Hackers

A recent investigation into misconfigured Apache Airflow instances has uncovered critical vulnerabilities exposing login...

Two Cybercriminals Arrested for ATM Jackpotting Scheme

Federal authorities have unveiled details of a sophisticated cybercrime operation targeting financial institutions across...

Black Basta’s Notorious Tactics and Techniques Exposed in Leaked Intel

A significant leak of internal chat logs from the Black Basta ransomware group has...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Sitecore Zero-Day Flaw Allows Remote Code Execution

A critical zero-day vulnerability in Sitecore’s enterprise content management system (CMS) has been uncovered,...

Apache Airflow Misconfigurations Leak Login Credentials to Hackers

A recent investigation into misconfigured Apache Airflow instances has uncovered critical vulnerabilities exposing login...

Two Cybercriminals Arrested for ATM Jackpotting Scheme

Federal authorities have unveiled details of a sophisticated cybercrime operation targeting financial institutions across...