Tuesday, March 4, 2025
HomeNetwork SecurityLarge Amount Of European ISP's Mobile Traffic Rerouted Through China Telecom

Large Amount Of European ISP’s Mobile Traffic Rerouted Through China Telecom

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

On 6th June, a large amount of European mobile network Traffic rerouted via China Telecom for nearly two hours, which begins at 09:43 UTC 6 June 2019.

The incident occurred due to BGP route leak from a Swiss-based data center colocation company Safe Host (AS21217) and it leads over 70,000 Traffic rerouted to China Telecom (AS4134) which is controlled by Chinese-government.

The routing incidents were noticed only for a few minutes, but many of the leaked routes were circulated more than 2 hours and more-specifics of routed prefixes.

70,000 Internet routes roughly compared with more than 300 million IP’s traffic and some of the most impacted European networks included Swisscom (AS3303) of Switzerland, KPN (AS1130) of Holland, and Bouygues Telecom (AS5410) and Numericable-SFR (AS21502) of France.

“China Telecom then announced these routes on to the global internet redirecting large amounts of internet traffic destined for some of the largest European mobile networks through China Telecom’s network”

There are various ISP prefixes were in this leak including, 1,300 Dutch prefixes, 200 Swiss prefixes, 150 Bouygues Telecom (AS5410) prefixes.

For an example, Based on the Oracle Internet Intelligence measurements, a traceroute in the following image below begins from Google in Ashburn and it destined for Vienna, Austria but it rerouted through China Telecom (hops 5-8).

China Telecom

Another traceroute from an Oracle datacenter is Toronto to Numericable-SFR in France that gets diverted through China Telecom (hops 8-10).

China Telecom

Oracle concludes with the statement says, Today’s incident shows that the internet has not yet eradicated the problem of BGP route leaks.

“It also reveals that China Telecom, a major international carrier, has still implemented neither the basic routing safeguards necessary both to prevent propagation of routing leaks nor the processes and procedures necessary to detect and remediate them in a timely manner when they inevitably occur. “

“Two hours is a long time for a routing leak of this magnitude to stay in circulation, degrading global communications,” said Doug Madory, director of Oracle’s internet analysis division.

You can follow us on Linkedin, Twitter, Facebook for daily Cybersecurity updates also you can take the Best Cybersecurity courses online to keep your self-updated.

Also Read:

A New Massive DDoS Attack bit-and-Piece Pattern Targeting Internet Service Providers

Hackers Launching DNS Hijacking Attack to Gain Access to Telecommunication & ISP Networks

Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Latest articles

Pathfinder AI – Hunters Announces New AI Capabilities for Smarter SOC Automation

Pathfinder AI expands Hunters' vision for AI-driven SOCs, introducing Agentic AI for autonomous investigation...

Google Secretly Tracks Android Devices Even Without User-Opened Apps

A recent technical study conducted by researchers at Trinity College Dublin has revealed that...

LLMjacking – Hackers Abuse GenAI With AWS NHIs to Hijack Cloud LLMs

In a concerning development, cybercriminals are increasingly targeting cloud-based generative AI (GenAI) services in...

Microsoft Strengthens Trust Boundary for VBS Enclaves

Microsoft has introduced a series of technical recommendations to bolster the security of Virtualization-Based...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Cl0p Ransomware Hide Itself on Compromised Networks After Exfiltrate the Data

The Cl0p ransomware group, a prominent player in the cybercrime landscape since 2019, has...

Ratatouille Malware Bypass UAC Control & Exploits I2P Network to Launch Cyber Attacks

A newly discovered malware, dubbed "Ratatouille" (or I2PRAT), is raising alarms in the cybersecurity...

Hackers Exploit 3,000 ASP.NET Machine Keys to Hack IIS Web Servers Remotely

Microsoft has raised alarms about a new cyber threat involving ViewState code injection attacks...