Thursday, February 20, 2025
HomeBackdoorNew Loki Backdoor Attacking macOS Systems

New Loki Backdoor Attacking macOS Systems

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

Cody Thomas developed Apfell, an open-source macOS post-exploitation framework, in 2018 and evolved into Mythic, a cross-platform framework that addresses the limitations of existing tools. 

Mythic provides a unified interface for managing agents written in various languages for different platforms, which allows for flexibility and customization, enabling the creation of agents with specific functionalities. 

Currently, the official Mythic repository houses over two dozen agents, where the Loki agent employs a modified djb2 hashing algorithm to obscure API functions and commands, which involves using a different magic number (2231) compared to the original Havoc agent. 

The hash value is calculated by iterating through the string, shifting the value left by 5 bits, adding the original hash value, and then adding the current character, which makes it more difficult to analyze and identify the agent’s behavior.

An example of the data sent before encryption by the July version of Loki, with the UUID visible on the right

The Loki loader, a piece of malware, sends encrypted information about the infected system to a command-and-control server.

In response, the server sends a DLL that the loader loads into the infected device’s memory, which handles further communication with the server. 

Both the May and July versions of the loader use similar encryption methods but have minor differences in data serialization and UUID handling. 

The May version sends a plaintext UUID, while the July version encodes it. After the initial connection, the loader transfers control to the DLL, which continues the malicious activity.

Traffic from the May version after encryption with plaintext UUID

The analyzed malware, stagger_1.1.dll, is a Windows x64 executable based on the Havoc agent, which communicates with a C2 server using a series of hashed commands, including file transfer, process management, and environment manipulation. 

The agent does not support traffic tunneling natively, but attackers frequently use third-party tools like ngrok or gTunnel to access private networks, which was observed being loaded and executed in memory to avoid detection.

Processing command hashes

According to Securelist, Russian companies in various industries have been targeted by a sophisticated malware campaign, likely delivered via email attachments, where the attackers, using publicly available tools, have successfully compromised over a dozen organizations. 

Victims are believed to have been tricked into opening malicious files, leading to the installation of the Loki malware.

Despite extensive research, attribution to a specific threat actor remains challenging due to the attackers’ evasive tactics and use of common tools.

The popularity of open-source post-exploitation frameworks has grown, with attackers increasingly using them to control and modify victim devices remotely.

These frameworks, like July and May loaders, often employ techniques that evade detection and attribution. 

Specific file hashes, network traffic patterns, and command-and-control (C2) addresses associated with these frameworks are indicators of compromise.

The main module, gTunnel, and ngrok are key components used for tunneling and establishing communication with the attacker.

Simulating Cyberattack Scenarios With All-in-One Cybersecurity Platform – Watch Free Webinar

Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Latest articles

Check Point Software to Open First Asia-Pacific R&D Centre in Bengaluru, India

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. has announced plans to establish its inaugural Asia-Pacific Research...

PoC Exploit Released for Ivanti Endpoint Manager Vulnerabilities

A recent investigation into Ivanti Endpoint Manager (EPM) has uncovered four critical vulnerabilities that...

Ransomware Trends 2025 – What’s new

As of February 2025, ransomware remains a formidable cyber threat, evolving in complexity and...

Hackers Delivering Malware Bundled with Fake Job Interview Challenges

ESET researchers have uncovered a series of malicious activities orchestrated by a North Korea-aligned...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Check Point Software to Open First Asia-Pacific R&D Centre in Bengaluru, India

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. has announced plans to establish its inaugural Asia-Pacific Research...

PoC Exploit Released for Ivanti Endpoint Manager Vulnerabilities

A recent investigation into Ivanti Endpoint Manager (EPM) has uncovered four critical vulnerabilities that...

Ransomware Trends 2025 – What’s new

As of February 2025, ransomware remains a formidable cyber threat, evolving in complexity and...