Monday, March 3, 2025
HomeSecurity NewsChinese Hacking Groups Involved With Historical Period of Hacks Against Gaming Studios...

Chinese Hacking Groups Involved With Historical Period of Hacks Against Gaming Studios & Software Companies

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

A new report indicates Chinese state-sponsored cyber espionage groups ‘Winnti Umbrella’ linked in a number of cyber campaigns from 2009 to 2018 targeted Gaming studios and Software companies in South Korea, United States, Japan, and China.

The Winnti umbrella is a collection of Chinese state-sponsored hacker group that includes a number of individual groups LEAD, BARIUM, Wicked Panda, GREF, PassCV, and others.

According to ProtectWise report the threats actors attacks against small organizations to exfiltrate the codesigning certificates and to use them in signing malware for use in high profile attacks.

The name “Winnti” used to refer the backdoor that created by the hacker groups that linked under the umbrella. In 2013 Kaspersky published a report on the original Winnti group and the technical details associated with it.

Researchers believe all the groups under Winnti umbrella share the same tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) and also their testing environments.

Also Read JSRAT – Secret Command and Control Channel Backdoor to Control Victims Machine Using JavaScript

Attack Methods – Winnti Umbrella

The Winnti umbrella and associated groups initial infections are through phishing to gain access to the target organization. In 2018 their campaigns primarily targeted on common services such as Office 365 and Gmail. With their most recent campaigns, they preferred using URL shortening service.

Winnti Umbrella

Once they gained access to organization network they use custom malware and tools like Metasploit and use number of techniques such as “living off the land” for minimizing the attack of detection.

Living off the land attack describes making use of the tools that already installed on the system or running simple scripts and shellcode directly in memory.

For C&C communication attackers use subdomains resembles target organizations and often they used abused TLS certificates from Let’s Encrypt and in many cases self-signed certificates.

“We have observed a few cases of the attackers mistakenly accessing victim machines without a proxy, potentially identifying the true location of the individual running the session. In all of these cases, the netblock was 221.216.0.0/13, the China Unicom Beijing Network, Xicheng District.”

Researchers said, “Overall the Winnti umbrella and linked groups are lacking when it comes to operational security. But some groups followed better operational security which indicates there is a division among them.”

“We hope the information we’ve shared in this report will help potential targets and known victims in addition to the greater information security community. Though they have at times been sloppy, the Winnti umbrella and its associated entities remain an advanced and potent threat” researchers concluded.

Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

New Poco RAT Via Weaponized PDF Attacking Users to Capture Sensitive Data

A new variant of malware, dubbed "Poco RAT," has emerged as a potent espionage...

U.S. Suspends Cyberattacks Against Russia

The United States has suspended offensive cyber operations against Russia under an order issued...

Hackers Abused Google and PayPal’s Infrastructure to Steal Users Personal Data

Cybersecurity researchers have uncovered a sophisticated phishing campaign leveraging Google Ads and PayPal’s infrastructure...

Njrat Exploits Microsoft Dev Tunnels for C2 Communication

A new campaign involving the notorious remote access trojan (RAT) Njrat has been uncovered,...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Chinese Hackers Breach Belgium State Security Service as Investigation Continues

Belgium’s State Security Service (VSSE) has suffered what is being described as its most...

Check Point Software to Open First Asia-Pacific R&D Centre in Bengaluru, India

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. has announced plans to establish its inaugural Asia-Pacific Research...

Threat Actors Trojanize Popular Games to Evade Security and Infect Systems

A sophisticated malware campaign was launched by cybercriminals, targeting users through trojanized versions of...