Sunday, March 2, 2025
HomeCyber AttackAcidPour Malware Attacking Linux Data Storage Devices To Wipe Out Data

AcidPour Malware Attacking Linux Data Storage Devices To Wipe Out Data

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

In March 2024, a new variant of the AcidRain wiper malware dubbed “AcidPour” was noticed. It targets Linux data storage devices and permanently erases data from the targeted systems, making them inoperative.

It targets crucial sectors of Linux devices such as SCSI SATA, Memory Technology Devices (MTD), MultiMediaCard Storage, DMSETUP, and Unsorted Block Image devices, overwriting contents and making recovery virtually impossible.

This damaging malware, which is frequently used in coordinated cyberattacks, can severely compromise an organization’s or an individual’s data.

The Malware’s Behaviour 

AcidRain is an ELF malware that targets MIPS-based modems and routers. It is linked to the ViaSat KA-SAT communication disruption that occurred during the early stages of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. 

Unlike AcidRain, AcidPour has a defense evasion technique where it overwrites itself with a generated sequence of bytes from 0-255 followed by a command line message “Ok”.

This technique serves as a defense evasion for analysts and malware researchers”, Splunk Threat Research Team shared with Cyber Security News.

Overwrites Itself

Using the select() function to put AcidPour’s code to sleep is another intriguing trick researchers noticed.

The timeout option, which indicates the maximum duration (in seconds) that select() should wait for events before returning, can be computed using two alternative parameters from AcidPour.

Time-based evasion technique

Malware Wipes Out Data On The Vulnerable Linux System

The malware systematically erased, overwritten, and wiped multiple directories as part of its destructive payload.

It primarily targets important folders, like “/boot,” which are necessary for rebooting the compromised Linux system. 

Recovery is almost impossible because the files in these targeted directories are replaced with 32KB of randomly generated bytes.

The wiper repeatedly and methodically overwrites files on the designated device paths with 256KB (0x40000) random-generated buffers by employing the file block overwrite technique.

AcidPour’s alternative method is comparable to AcidRain’s, which uses system Input/Output Control (IOCTL) commands to execute malicious actions. 

“System Shutdown/Reboot (T1529)After wiping and deleting files, the compromised host or system will reboot, rendering it unbootable as all critical files have been wiped and deleted”, researchers said.

While AcidPour and AcidRain, or VPNFilter’s ‘dstr’ module, have similar file wiping capabilities, researchers point out that AcidPour is specifically made to destroy or damage compromised host or production networks, whereas VPNFilter—which Cisco Talos first identified—has extra features for data exfiltration and code injection.

Tushar Subhra
Tushar Subhra
Tushar is a Cyber security content editor with a passion for creating captivating and informative content. With years of experience under his belt in Cyber Security, he is covering Cyber Security News, technology and other news.

Latest articles

Network Penetration Testing Checklist – 2025

Network penetration testing is a cybersecurity practice that simulates cyberattacks on an organization's network...

Hackers can Crack Into Car Cameras Within Minutes Exploiting Vulnerabilities

At the upcoming Black Hat Asia 2025 conference, cybersecurity experts will unveil a groundbreaking...

Chinese Hackers Breach Belgium State Security Service as Investigation Continues

Belgium’s State Security Service (VSSE) has suffered what is being described as its most...

Hacktivist Groups Emerge With Powerful Tools for Large-Scale Cyber Operations

Hacktivism, once synonymous with symbolic website defacements and distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, has evolved...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

New Pass-the-Cookie Attacks Bypass MFA, Giving Hackers Full Account Access

Multi-factor authentication (MFA), long considered a cornerstone of cybersecurity defense, is facing a formidable...

Winos4.0 Malware Targets Windows Users Through Malicious PDF Files

A new wave of cyberattacks leveraging the Winos4.0 malware framework has targeted organizations in...

Lotus Blossom Hacker Group Uses Dropbox, Twitter, and Zimbra for C2 Communications

The Lotus Blossom hacker group, also known as Spring Dragon, Billbug, or Thrip, has...