Monday, March 3, 2025
HomecryptocurrencyCyber Criminals Stolen $18 Million From Bitcoin Gold Network Using Double Spend...

Cyber Criminals Stolen $18 Million From Bitcoin Gold Network Using Double Spend Attack

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

Hackers have stolen around $18 Million worth of BTG (Bitcoin Gold) from Bitcoin Gold Network using a new attack method called “Double Spend”.

Attackers using  “51% attacks”  which means An attacker that controls more than 50% of the network’s computing power and they take over more than 50 % of hashpower.

Double spend attack is a type of an attempt where attack using the same coin twice and send the same coin into different Exchange wallet at the same time.

This method allows attackers to control the blockchain transactions, and they have an ability to exclude and modify the ordering of transactions.

Exchange Wallet is Primary Target

This attack is largely targeted to the Bitcoin Gold Exchange wallet and there is no risk for the individual users or the fund that existing in the wallet.

But the main risk is for who involved with a larger amount of payment accept directly from the attacker.

According to bitcoingold, The cost of mounting an ongoing attack is high. Because the cost is high, the attacker can only profit if they can quickly get something of high value from a fake deposit. A party like an Exchange may accept large deposits automatically, allow the user to trade into a different coin quickly, and then withdraw automatically. This is why they are targeting Exchanges.

This is not the first time that attackers using this  Double Spend method to compromise the cryptocurrency wallet but already another targeted Exchanges reported that they strongly believe this attacker attempted to hit them with a double-spend of BTC in the past.

A Double-Spend to Bitcoin Gold

An Attempt to spend same BTG coin twice in two different exchange wallet that attackers owned and send the coin both wallet in exactly same time.

Blockchain maintains the queue to resolve this type of transactions are added to blocks. so once 2 same transactions added into the blocks, Exchange wallet choose the first traction is valid and the transaction that came second will be declined.

Also, an order of the block will be cleared if the transactions were sent at the exact same time Along these lines, the coins must be sent to one place – either to the Exchange or to the private wallet.

So far, Attackers Earned  $18 Million

BTG address of this attacker earned around $18 Million so far that is exchanged in this wallet GTNjvCGssb2rbLnDV1xxsHmunQdvXnY2Ft.

  • Funds: GTNjvCGssb2rbLnDV1xxsHmunQdvXnY2Ft
  • Receive mined coins: GXXjRkdquAkyHeJ6ReW3v4FY3QbgPfugTx

Until now, some Exchanges were operating with less than five confirmations required. We have been urging higher limits to prevent such an attack and urging manual review of large deposits of BTG before clearing the funds for trading. bitcoin gold said.

The Bitcoin Gold team advised crypto exchanges to increase the number of confirmations required for a deposit to clear.

Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Latest articles

Threat Actors Exploiting AES Encryption for Stealthy Payload Protection

Cybersecurity researchers have uncovered a surge in the use of Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)...

33.3 Million Cyber Attacks Targeted Mobile Devices in 2024 as Threats Surge

Kaspersky's latest report on mobile malware evolution in 2024 reveals a significant increase in...

Routers Under Attack as Scanning Attacks on IoT and Networks Surge to Record Highs

In a concerning trend, the frequency of scanning attacks targeting Internet of Things (IoT)...

Google Launches Shielded Email to Keep Your Address Hidden from Apps

Google is rolling out a new privacy-focused feature called Shielded Email, designed to prevent apps...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Stablecoin Bank Hit by Cyberattack, Loses $49.5M to Hackers

The cryptocurrency sector faced one of its most significant security breaches this year as...

Biggest Crypto Hack in History – Hackers Stolen $1.46 Billion Worth Crypto From Bybit

In what has become the largest cryptocurrency theft in history, hackers infiltrated Bybit’s Ethereum...

New Zhong Stealer Malware Exploit Zendesk to Attack Fintech and Cryptocurrency

A newly identified malware, dubbed Zhong Stealer, has emerged as a significant threat to...