Monday, March 3, 2025
HomeMalwareFakebank Malware Variant that Intercepts Android user's Banking Calls

Fakebank Malware Variant that Intercepts Android user’s Banking Calls

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

The Fakebank malware comes back, with its new Fakebank malware variant that intercepts the Android users’ banking incoming and outgoing calls. Attackers distributed the app through third-party Android markets and social media websites.

Security researchers from Symantec identified the malicious behavior of the apps infected with Android.Fakebank that intercepts the calls made by the users to their banks.

With the current variant it targets Korean bank clients, so far 22 apps have been identified infected with the Fakebank malware. The previous variant of the Fakebank malware intercepts the SMS applications to gather financial information.

The previous version of the Fakebank malware variant targets Russian speaking nations and Russian banks with high Obfuscation technique to steal highly sensitive information.

Fakebank Malware Variant

When the app triggered it collects the personal information from user’s phone and submits to the command and control servers. The server responds with the configuration that specifies the phone number.

Fakebank Malware
Researchers said “When users call a real banking phone number, the malware is able to intercept and transfer the call to the scammer’s configured phone number. When a call comes in from a scammer, the app will overlay a fake UI dialog that spoofs a legitimate bank caller ID and number”.

The API and associated permissions evolved based on the Android versions (android.permission.SYSTEM_ALERT_WINDOW). With Android version’s below 6 the permission needs to be declared in the manifest file and it requires permission at the time of installation.

With Android version 6 & 7 if the permission declared in the manifest file and the app downloaded from Google Play, it won’t prompt users for permission. From the Android version 8, the app is not allowed to overlay system so the malware will not execute.

Common Defences On Mobile Threats

  • Give careful consideration to the permission asked for by applications.
  • Download applications from trusted sources.
  • Stay up with the latest version.
  • Encrypt your devices.
  • Make frequent backups of important data.
  • Install anti-malware on their devices.
  • Stay strict with CIA Cycle.
Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

Threat Actors Exploiting AES Encryption for Stealthy Payload Protection

Cybersecurity researchers have uncovered a surge in the use of Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)...

33.3 Million Cyber Attacks Targeted Mobile Devices in 2024 as Threats Surge

Kaspersky's latest report on mobile malware evolution in 2024 reveals a significant increase in...

Routers Under Attack as Scanning Attacks on IoT and Networks Surge to Record Highs

In a concerning trend, the frequency of scanning attacks targeting Internet of Things (IoT)...

Google Launches Shielded Email to Keep Your Address Hidden from Apps

Google is rolling out a new privacy-focused feature called Shielded Email, designed to prevent apps...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Chinese Hackers Breach Belgium State Security Service as Investigation Continues

Belgium’s State Security Service (VSSE) has suffered what is being described as its most...

Winos4.0 Malware Targets Windows Users Through Malicious PDF Files

A new wave of cyberattacks leveraging the Winos4.0 malware framework has targeted organizations in...

Lotus Blossom Hacker Group Uses Dropbox, Twitter, and Zimbra for C2 Communications

The Lotus Blossom hacker group, also known as Spring Dragon, Billbug, or Thrip, has...