Sunday, May 19, 2024

SoumniBot Exploiting Android Manifest Flaws to Evade Detection

A new banker, SoumniBot, has recently been identified. It targets Korean users and is incredible by using an unusual method to evade investigation and detection, notably obfuscating the Android manifest.

In addition to its unique obfuscation, SoumniBot stands out for its ability to steal Korean online banking keys—something Android bankers hardly do. 

This capability enables malicious actors to bypass bank authentication procedures and empty the wallets of unintentional victims. 

Researchers say SoumniBot’s creators sadly succeeded because the Android manifest parser code’s validations were not strictly enough.

Techniques Used By SoumniBot

The Kaspersky researchers explain that the standard unarchiving function in the libziparchive library only allows the following two values for the Compression method in the record header: 0x0000 (STORED, which is uncompressed) and 0x0008 (DEFLATED, which is compressed using the zlib library’s deflate), else it returns an error.

However, the Android developers choose to provide a different scenario in which the value of the Compression method field is checked wrongly rather than utilizing this function.

“If the APK parser comes across any Compression method value but 0x0008 (DEFLATED) in the APK for the AndroidManifest.

xml entry, it considers the data uncompressed. This allows app developers to put any value except 8 into Compression method and write uncompressed data”, researchers said.

Invalid Compression method value followed by uncompressed data

The Android APK parser successfully identifies the manifest and permits application installation, even though any unpacker that correctly implements compression method validation would consider a manifest like that invalid.

Secondly, the size of the manifest file is indicated in the header of the AndroidManifest.xml entry within the ZIP archive.

Even though the entry’s size is indicated inaccurately, it will be copied from the archive unaltered if stored uncompressed. 

The manifest parser ignores any overlay or information after the payload that isn’t connected to the manifest.

This is exploited by the malware, which adds some of the archive content to the unpacked manifest due to the archived manifest’s reported size exceeding its real size. 

Finally, the names of the XML namespaces are represented by very long strings included in the manifest.

These kinds of strings make manifests unreadable for both people and programs, which might not have enough memory allocated to handle them. 

“When run for the first time, the Trojan hides the app icon to complicate removal, and then starts to upload data in the background from the victim’s device to mainsite every 15 seconds”, researchers said.

The information contains the victim’s ID, which was created using the trust device-android library, contact and account lists, the country inferred from the IP address, SMS and MMS messages, and other data.

The Trojan subscribes to messages from the MQTT server to receive commands.

If you want to avoid becoming a victim of malware of that kind, it is advised to use a reputable security app on your smartphone to identify the Trojan and stop it from installing despite all of its tactics.

Indicators of compromise

MD5
0318b7b906e9a34427bf6bbcf64b6fc8
00aa9900205771b8c9e7927153b77cf2
b456430b4ed0879271e6164a7c0e4f6e
fa8b1592c9cda268d8affb6bceb7a120

C&C
https[://]google.kt9[.]site
https[://]dbdb.addea.workers[.]dev

Website

Latest articles

Hackers Exploiting Docusign With Phishing Attack To Steal Credentials

Hackers prefer phishing as it exploits human vulnerabilities rather than technical flaws which make...

Norway Recommends Replacing SSLVPN/WebVPN to Stop Cyber Attacks

A very important message from the Norwegian National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) says that...

New Linux Backdoor Attacking Linux Users Via Installation Packages

Linux is widely used in numerous servers, cloud infrastructure, and Internet of Things devices,...

ViperSoftX Malware Uses Deep Learning Model To Execute Commands

ViperSoftX malware, known for stealing cryptocurrency information, now leverages Tesseract, an open-source OCR engine,...

Santander Data Breach: Hackers Accessed Company Database

Santander has confirmed that there was a major data breach that affected its workers...

U.S. Govt Announces Rewards up to $5 Million for North Korean IT Workers

The U.S. government has offered a prize of up to $5 million for information...

Russian APT Hackers Attacking Critical Infrastructure

Russia leverages a mix of state-backed Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) groups and financially motivated...

Free Webinar

Live API Attack Simulation

94% of organizations experience security problems in production APIs, and one in five suffers a data breach. As a result, cyber-attacks on APIs increased from 35% in 2022 to 46% in 2023, and this trend continues to rise.
Key takeaways include:

  • An exploit of OWASP API Top 10 vulnerability
  • A brute force ATO (Account Takeover) attack on API
  • A DDoS attack on an API
  • Positive security model automation to prevent API attacks

Related Articles